Two Models of Radical Revelation in Austrian Philosophy

Authors

  • Balazs Mezei Peter Pazmany Catholic University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v1i1.332

Abstract

In this paper I highlight two opposing models of the notion of divine revelation: the propositional and the radical. The propositional understanding of revelation was central to theology and philosophy until the 19th century. Since then, a number of other models of revelation have emerged. I define as radical the understanding of revelation which emphasizes two features of revelation: 1) God’s existence is *per se* revelatory; 2) God’s revelation is *per se* self-revelation. I propose too an assessment of the notion of propositional revelation as presented by Richard Swinburne. And I offer detailed analyses of two representatives of the early understanding of divine revelation as self-revelation: the views of Bernard Bolzano and Anton Günther. Bolzano, the renowned mathematician, was also a philosopher of religion; and Günther, one of the most ingenious writers in Austrian philosophy, was not only a theologian but also a philosopher comparable to the important figures of 19th century German thought. 

Downloads

Published

2009-03-21

How to Cite

Mezei, Balazs. 2009. “Two Models of Radical Revelation in Austrian Philosophy”. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 1 (1):99-120. https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v1i1.332.

Issue

Section

Research Articles