Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Religion for Naturalists and the Meaning of Belief

Natalja Deng

Abstract

This article relates the philosophical discussion on naturalistic religious practice to Tim Crane’s The Meaning of Belief: Religion from an Atheist’s Point of View, in which he claims that atheists can derive no genuine solace from religion. I argue that Crane’s claim is a little too strong. There is a sense in which atheists can derive solace from religion and that fact is worth acknowledging (whether or not this counts as ‘genuine’ solace). 

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ahmed, Arif. 2018. “The Meaning of Belief: Religion from an Atheist’s Point of View, by Tim Crane”. Mind 127, no. 508: 1261–70. doi:10.1093/mind/fzy018.

Botton, Alain. 2012. Religion for Atheists. London: Penguin.

Bohn, Einar Duenger. 2018. “The Logic of Hope: A Defense of the Hopeful”. Religious Studies 54, no. 1: 107-116. doi:10.1017/S0034412516000469.

Cordry, Benjamin. 2010. “A Critique of Religious Fictionalism”. Religious Studies 46, no. 1: 77–89. doi:10.1017/S0034412509990291.

Crane, Tim. 2017. The Meaning of Belief: Religion from an Atheist’s Point of View. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.

Deng, Natalja. 2015. “Religion for Naturalists”. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 78, no. 2: 195–214. doi:10.1007/s11153-015-9529-y.

Dumitriu, Petru. 1982. To the Unknown God (Au Dieu Inconnu). New York, NY: Seabury Press.

Dworkin, Ronald. 2013. Religion without God. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.

Eshleman, Andrew. 2010. “Religious Fictionalism Defended: Reply to Cordry”. Religious Studies 46, no. 1: 91–96. doi:10.1017/S0034412509990333.

Harrison, Victoria. 2010. “Philosophy of Religion, Fictionalism, and Religious Diversity”. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 68, no. 1-3: 43–58.

James, William. 1902. The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature. New York, NY: Longmans, Green and Co.

Jay, Christopher. 2014. “The Kantian Moral Hazard Argument for Religious Fictionalism”. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 75, no. 3: 207–32. doi:10.1007/s11153-013-9435-0.

Joyce, Richard. 2001. The Myth of Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

Le Poidevin, Robin. 1996. Arguing for Atheism: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion. London: Routledge.

—. 2016. “Playing the God Game: The Perils of Religious Fictionalism”. In Alternative Concepts of God: Essays on the Metaphysics of the Divine, edited by Andrei A. Buckareff and Yujin Nagasawa, 178–94. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Lipton, Peter. 2007. “Science and Religion: The Immersion Solution”. In Realism and Religion: Philosophical and Theological Perspectives, edited by Michael Scott and Andrew Moore, 31–46. Brookfield: Taylor and Francis.

Malcolm, Finlay. 2018. “Can Fictionalists Have Faith?”. Religious Studies 54, no. 2: 215–32. doi:10.1017/S0034412517000063.

Nagel, Thomas. 2010. Secular Philosophy and The Religious Temperament. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Scott, Michael. 2010. “Religious Language”. Philosophy Compass 5, no. 6: 505–15. doi:10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00301.x.

Scott, Michael, and Finlay Malcolm. forthcoming. “Religious Fictionalism”. Philosophy Compass.

Szabó, Zoltán G. 2011. “Critical Study of Mark Eli Kalderon (ed.) Fictionalism in Mataphysics”. Noûs 45, no. 2: 375–85. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0068.2011.00828.x.

Whitehead, Alfred N. 1967. Science and the Modern World. New York, NY: Free Press.

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.