Being Perfect is Not Necessary for Being God

Authors

  • Jeanine Diller University of Toledo, Ohio

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v11i2.2970

Abstract

Classic perfect being theologians take ‘being perfect’ (or some careful variant thereof) to be conceptually necessary and sufficient for being God. I argue that this claim is false because being perfect is not conceptually necessary for being God. I rest my case on a simple thought experiment inspired by an alternative I developed to perfect being theology that I call “functional theology.” My findings, if correct, are a boon for theists since if it should turn out that there is no perfect being, there could still be a God.

References

Augustine. 1996. Enchiridion on Faith, Hope and Love. Washington, D.C.: Regnery Publishing Company.

Block, Ned. “What is Functionalism?”. In Readings in Philosophy of Psychology: Vol. 1., edited by Ned Block, 171–84. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard Univ. Press.

Brown, Raymond E., Joseph E. Fitzmyer, and Roland E. Murphy, eds. 1990. The New Jerome Biblical Commentary. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

Burrell, David B. 2004. “Thomas Aquinas and Islam”. Modern Theology 20, no. 1: 71–89. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0025.2004.00243.x.

Cohen, Shaye. 1987. From the Maccabees to the Mishnah. Philadelphia, PA: Westminster Press.

Copleston, Frederick. 1985. A History of Philosophy: Vol. I. Greece and Rome. New York, NY: Doubleday.

Diller, Jeanine. 2000. “The Content and Coherence of Theism”. Dissertation, Univ. of Michigan.

Diller, Jeanine, and Asa Kasher, eds. 2013. Models of God and Alternative Ultimate Realities. New York, NY: Springer.

Fuller, Reginald. 1987. “God in the New Testament”. In The Encyclopedia of Religion: Vol. VI., edited by Mircea Eliade. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Co.

Guthrie, W. K. C. 1965-81. A History of Greek Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

Hill, William J. 1971. “The Attributes of God”. In Encyclopedia of Religion, edited by Mircea Eliade. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Co.

Horton, Walter M. 1958. Christian Theology: An Ecumenical Approach. New York, NY: Harper & Row Publishers.

Kelly, J. N. D. 1950. Early Christian Creeds. London: Longmans, Green and Co.

Kenney, John P. 2013. “The Platonic Monotheism of Plotinus”. In Models of God and Alternative Ultimate Realities, edited by Jeanine Diller and Asa Kasher, 775–81. New York, NY: Springer.

Lewis, David. 1972. “Psychophysical and Theoretical Identifications”. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 50: 249–58.

Morris, Thomas V. 1984. “The God of Abraham, Isaac and Anselm”. Faith and Philosophy 1, no. 2: 177–87. doi:10.5840/faithphil19841213.

Railton, Peter. 1993. “Non-cognitivism about Rationality: Benefits, Costs and an Alternative”. Philosophical Issues 4: 47–48.

Stump, Eleonore. 2016. The God of the Bible and the God of the Philosophers. Milwaukee, WI.: Marquette Univ. Press.

Wierenga, Edward. 2011. “Augustinian Perfect Being Theology and the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob”. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69, no. 2: 139–51. doi:10.1007/s11153-010-9270-5.

Wiggins, David. 1980. Sameness and Substance. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard Univ. Press.

Downloads

Published

2019-06-20

How to Cite

Diller, Jeanine. 2019. “Being Perfect Is Not Necessary for Being God”. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 11 (2):43-64. https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v11i2.2970.