Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Against Mereological Panentheism

Oliver D. Crisp

Abstract

In this paper I offer an argument against one important version of panentheism, that is, mereological panentheism. Although panentheism has proven difficult to define, I provide a working definition of the view, and proceed to argue that given this way of thinking about the doctrine, mereological accounts of panentheism have serious theological drawbacks. I then explore some of these theological drawbacks. In a concluding section I give some reasons for thinking that the classical theistic alternative to panentheism is preferable, all things considered.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adams, Marilyn M. 2006. Christ and Horrors: The Coherence of Christology. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511607585.

Brierley, Michael W. 2008. “The Potential of Panentheism for Dialogue Between Science and Religion”. In The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science, edited by Philip Clayton and Simpson Zachary, 635–51. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Clayton, Philip. 1998. “The Case for Christian Panentheism”. Dialogue 37, no. 3: 201–8.

Clayton, Philip, and Simpson Zachary, eds. 2008. The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Cooper, John W. 2006. Panentheism, The Other God of the Philosophers: From Plato to the Present. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Academic.

Craig, William L. 2016. God Over All: Divine Aseity and the Challenge of Platonism. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Crisp, Oliver D. 2012. Jonathan Edwards on God and Creation. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Cross, F. L., and Elizabeth A. Livingstone, eds. 1997. The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press..

Culp, John. 2017. “Panentheism”. Last modified June 3, 2017. Accessed March 5, 2018. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/panentheism/.

Daeley, Justin J. 2017. “Creatio Ex Nihilo: A Solution to the Problem of the Necessity of Creation and Divine Aseity”. Philosophia Christi 19, no. 2: 291–313. doi:10.5840/pc201719225.

Göcke, Benedikt P. 2013. “Panentheism and Classical Theism”. Sophia 52, no. 1: 61–75. doi:10.1007/s11841-011-0292-y.

Gunton, Colin E. 1991. Promise of Trinitarian Theology. London: T&T Clark.

Hudson, Hud. 2009. “Omnipresence”. In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology, edited by Thomas P. Flint and Michael C. Rea, 199–216. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Hutchings, Patrick. 2010. “Postlude: Panentheism”. Sophia 49, no. 2: 297–300. doi:10.1007/s11841-010-0186-4.

Inman, Ross D. 2017. “Omnipresence and the Location of the Immaterial”. In Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion Volume 8, edited by Jonathan L. Kvanvig, 168–206. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Jenson, Robert W. 1999. Systematic Theology Vol. 1: The Triune God. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

—. 1999. Systematic Theology Vol. 2: The Works of God. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

McCall, Thomas H. 2010. Which Trinity? Whose Monotheism? Philosophical and Systematic Theologians on the Metaphysics of Trinitarian Theology. Grand Rapids, Mich.: W.B. Eerdmans Pub. Co.

Moltmann, Jürgern. 1981. The Trinity and the Kingdom. London: SCM Press.

Morris, Thomas V., and Christopher Menzel. 1986. “Absolute Creation”. American Philosophical Quarterly 23, no. 4: 353–62.

Mullins, R. T. 2016. “The Difficulty with Demarcating Panentheism”. Sophia 55, no. 3: 325–46. doi:10.1007/s11841-015-0497-6.

Peterson, Gregory R. 2001. “Whither Panentheism?”. Zygon 36, no. 3: 395–405. doi:10.1111/0591-2385.00370.

Pruss, Alexander. 2013. “Omnipresence, Multilocation, the Real Presence and Time Travel”. Journal of Analytic Theology 1, no. 1: 60–73.

Thomas, Owen C. 2008. “Problems in Panentheism”. In The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science, edited by Philip Clayton and Simpson Zachary, 652–64. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.